New Developments In Todays Court Room - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1551 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Analytical essay Did you like this example? Cameras in the courtroom although not a new topic still seems to be a topic of hot debate. According to an article entitled, Sotomayor Should Push for Cameras in the Courtroom just published in June of 2009; A federal judicial courtroom is still deciding about the judges discretionary power to allow camera in the court room even in 2009 (Breyer Hyatt, 2009). This paper will attempt to look at the history of cameras in the courtroom, the pros and the cons of cameras in our courtrooms, famous court room cases watched by america, and the evolution of cameras in our court rooms today. Cameras first came into play in one of the biggest trials of the 20th century; Bruno Hauptmann for the kidnapping and murder of Charles Lindberghs child. This led to the restriction of cameras and ultimately led to new laws being adopted to protect privacy; reporters were not restricted due to the media frenzy that ensued as a result of the the Lindbergh case. In turn, this case led to The American Bar Association recommended, and many states adopted, rules restricting the use of television cameras, still cameras and broadcast recorders and microphones in courtrooms (Prak, M., Davis, J, p. 2). Another major move in the history of cameras in the court room came in 1965 from Texas In 1965, the United States Supreme Court held that Texas financier Bill Sol Estes had his rights violated by allowing a camera to records his trail (p. 2). This debate would linger for years in which journalists were banned from using cameras, microphones or ever recorders when it came to court proceedings. Another important step forward for camera in the court room is CSPAN was the first ever television station to televise a Supreme Court senate confirmation, the senate confirmation of Sandra OConnor. This proved to be a historic day as it paved the way for televised court proceeding. The next big debate for cameras in the courtroom would come in 1981 in the case of Chandler vs. Florida when the idea of cameras had become less foreign and less like an intrusive object into the world of justice, As a result of camera allowed in trials against two Florida men who were accused of burglary both asserted they had been denied a fair trial. The court in the decision of Chandler v. Florida upheld there convictions. The court ruled that both did not have a valid argument that the criminal trial being broadcast after their right to due process. Furthermore the court argued there was no data that proved that the presence of the media affected the process (Prak, M., Davis, J, p. 2). As a result of this case you could argue this also paved the way for popularizing and glarorizing televised courtroom programs such as Court TV and many other court room shows that are popular. Although the rules and regulations for cameras in the court room has changed dramatically over the years some principles still stand. Court room cameras are still not allowed in juvenile court p roceedings, adoption cases and child custody cases. These types of special hearings are still considered protected from the medias eye. There are many pros to allowing a camera to be involved in the court room process. According to the International Debate Education Association; putting cameras in court will improve public confidence in the judiciary and the system of justice as a whole. It is difficult to see how the public can have confidence in a system that most of them never see (Weeks, 2000). The article goes on further to report, Weeks goes on further to argue that court preceding especially in other countries deal with the doctrine of president, in essence one case decides the fate of those that follow (Weeks, 2000). Finally, one of the last arguments for proponents of camera in the court room is that we as a society have certain rights, especially when it comes to public court proceeds. Anyone can attend these proceeding no matter if they are involved in the case or j ust a citizen who wants to observe. With that in mind how is broadcasting it any different? It is making readily available to individuals who already have the right to view it. On the opposite side, those opposed to cameras in the court room also have valid points; Weeks states that television and the media is distorted and sensationalized and therefore citizens would not get a great or accurate picture of what is actually going on in the legal proceedings. The same article also points out yet another reason we as a society should rethink the idea of cameras in the court room; The system of justice will actually be harmed by televising trials, for two reasons; the effect upon the witnesses and victims of crime, and the possible corruption of the jury and witnesses. Firstly, the prospect that an alleged victim of a crime will have to give evidence in court already deters many from bringing prosecutions. Victims will be much less prepared to give evidence if they know that th is painful experience is going to be seen by an audience of millions (Weeks, 2000). Are we exposing victims and potential witnesses just for the entertainment of those watching? This could essentially skew the trial process all together; There is a clear tension between the democratic right of the people at large to watch a trial, and the liberty of the defendant in any given case. It is a fundamental precept of many legal systems that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty. By showing the defendant on television, the general public will be able to reach conclusions about guilt or innocence that may not be reflected in the final verdict of the jury. People will tend to assume that theres no smoke without fire although this principle cannot properly be applied to the criminal justice system (Weeks, 2000). In conclusion, there are many reasons for and against why having cameras in the courtroom is either appropriate or inappropriate. However, at the time it appears ca meras are here to stay. One of the most famous cases proves the good and the bad when it comes to cameras in the court room, the case of O.J. Simpson. Everyone knows the infamous case of O.J. Simpson. According to one source over a one-third of the American Public watched the infamous trial (Jrank.org, 1994). The article goes on to point out an even bigger picture of just how the media covered this trial: Over two thousand reporters covered the trial, and 80 miles of cable was required to allow nineteen television stations to cover the trial live to 91 percent of the American viewing audience. When the verdict was finally read on October 3, 1995, some 142 million people listened or watched. It seemed the nation stood still, divided along racial lines as to the defendants guilt or innocence. During and after the trial, over eighty books were published about the event by most everyone involved in the Simpson case (Jrank.org, 1994). This trail could be labeled as the Trial of the Century in the modern world. One question many have brought up is why? What was the medias fascination with this case or criminal cases in general? According to an article entitled The Publics Fascination with The O.J. Simpson Trial we as a society are voyeurs; According to Lustberg, Americans have always been fascinated with public figures and celebrities. He asserts that as a society who has become increasing engrossed in the lives of other due to all the new technological advances. As a result, the O.J. Simpson story provided people with emotional and physical entertainment. (Lustberg, 1995). In essence it seems that we as a society will always have a fascination with watching court room drama. Whether real or fake it appears as a society the fascination with media in the Court room is here to stay and might explain why a number of TV shows are popping up involving courts. One of the most new types of shows are Judge Shows The shows that mock legal court proceedings in an effort to get ratings. According to one article: There is one brand of reality show that seems to succeed where all others have failed. The judge shows that grace morning television all over America have become extremely popular with those who are home to watch them. (Noriega, 2006). This is the newest adaptation of voyeurism in the court, although most are not set in a real courtroom they mock the essence of the courtroom which obviously appears to America. In conclusion, it appears Americas fascination with media in the Courtroom is here to stay. Although there are many legal issues that still need to be figured out and the rules and regulations are different in every jurisdiction, Media in the Courts is here to stay. Although this issue will probably remain in debate for many years to come one thing is for sure: Whereas if you have a camera in the courtroom, theres no filtering. What you see is whats there. (ITO, 1995) and that is probably one of the main reasons came ras have been allowed the courtroom. The camera is an unbiased eye that lets the general public see for themselves what actually goes on in the courtroom and make their own conclusions. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "New Developments In Todays Court Room" essay for you Create order

The Center For Disease Control And Prevention - 1218 Words

Sharp Safety Procedures and Guidelines Kelli Bauman Bake University School of Nursing NU332: Foundations of Nursing November 11, 2015 Sharps Safety Procedure and Guidelines The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2011, para. 2) defines a sharps injury as, â€Å"a penetrating stab wound from a needle, scalpel, or other sharp object that may result in exposure to blood or other body fluids.† Different types of sharps include intravenous cannulas, butterfly needles, hypodermic needles, phlebotomy needles, lancets, scalpels, suture needles, razors, scissors, tissues, and fragments of bone (Weston, 2013, p.208). Sharps injuries affect a great number of health care professionals in the workplace . It is estimated that†¦show more content†¦Education programs created for health care professionals about sharps safety teaches people about various workplace settings where sharps injuries take place. According to the Health Protection Agency (2008), sharp injuries occur during use of sharps, after use but before disposal, between steps in procedures, during disposal, and while recapping needles. In developing nations, where sharp injures are more prevalent, the causes may be linked to lack of knowledge, lack of training, and reusable designs of sharp devices (Duesman Duncan, 2012). Consequently, education programs serve the purpose to identify the situations in which injury occurs and to identify methods to reduce these injuries. Education programs seek to identify strategies used to reduce sharps injuries in the situations where they may occur. The Council on Surgical and Perioperative Safety (2007) developed a set of Safe Surgery Principles. The fifth principle states, â€Å"The Council on Surgical and Perioperative Safety endorses sharps safety measures to prevent injury during perioperative care. Sharps safety measures should include double-gloving, blunt suture needles for fascial closure, and the neutral zone when appropriate to avoid hand to hand passage of sharps.† Double gloving reduces the risk of provider exposure to the patient’s blood by offering another layer of protection. Blunt suture need les reduce the risk for injury by making

EchoStar Communications Free Essays

Charles W. Egren founded EchoStar Communications in 1980. The Company and its subsidiaries deliver Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) television products and services to customers worldwide. We will write a custom essay sample on EchoStar Communications or any similar topic only for you Order Now EchoStar Communications Corporation acquired the license to deliver DBS products in 1987 and is a publicly traded company (NASDAQ: DISH).   As at April 27, 2007, EchoStar Communications Corporation is trading at $ 46.51 per share. EchoStar provides Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) television products and services (satellite delivered digital television) through its DISH NetworkTM to over 12 million customers in the United States of America. The company’s shares are doing very well compared with companies in the same industry like Comcast and Verizon. As at April 27th, 2007, Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ: CMCSK) is trading at $26.68 per share while Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) is selling its shares at $38.15 a piece. Comcast Corporation is a cable operator in the United States and offers a variety of consumer entertainment and communication products and services. Verizon Communications Inc. is a provider of communications services. It has two segments, Wireline and Domestic Wireless, which it operates and manages as strategic business units and organizes by products and services (www.businessweek.com). These companies all have similar products to Dish Network. Comcast Communications is a cable giant and was the number one broadband provider in the country in 2005. Cable operators like Comcast have been leaders in supplying speedy Internet connections to consumers. They offer lower prices and higher speeds, thereby gaining a market of about 22 million U.S. households out of a total of 39 million that have broadband. Verizon (a telecom giant) had to get into the television business because Comcast and the other cable companies were getting a share of the telecom market. In order to boost growth Verizon need it needed to move aggressively into new markets.   Verizon dropped their prices for broadband to as low as $15 a month and cranking up speeds. The company also started offering speeds 10 times as fast as standard cable service. It targeted TV and broadband and offered extra-fast Net connections and TV services. In addition, Verizon started to offer customers the same bundles of voice and video that the cable players do. They had to do this because the cable industry was taking a share in the voice market. This gave birth to Verizon TV, which offers services like allowing customers to watch one show and, at the same time, record another. Other cable companies did not offer this. Verizon TV also has more channels and more choice of on-demand video than some of its competitors like Dish. Today, with more than 12 million customers, DISH Network offers the lowest all-digital TV price in America. References Rewired And Ready For Combat. (2005). Retrieved April 27, 2007, from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_45/b3958089.htm http://www.echostar.com http://www.verizon.com http://www.comcast.com How to cite EchoStar Communications, Papers

Poverty and mistreatment surrounding Oliver Essay Example For Students

Poverty and mistreatment surrounding Oliver Essay Oliver Twist is a novel by Charles Dickens. It is about a boy who lived in the unfair society of Victorian England. From the very start, the reader can see that lower class people were treated unfairly and rejected by everyone as part of the community. There were no benefits for poor people or people who couldnt get jobs, so they had to get by however they could, even if that meant breaking the law. Dickens may have wanted to highlight the poverty and mistreatment so he could change peoples perspectives and maybe the way people lived. Even at the very start of his life, Oliver is born in poor conditions, his mother dies giving birth to him in a workhouse, with only a drunk nurse and an uncaring parish surgeon to look after him now. For the whole of his life Oliver is bound to be seen as an obstacle in everyone elses life It is very likely that it will be troublesome, Oliver is referred to as it making him seem more like an object that a person- something that will just get in the way. As one of the poorest people in England, it was possible that Oliver was one of the most mistreated too. This is of no coincidence, as Oliver had no importance and no family to love him either. Oliver cried lustily. If he could have known that he was an orphan perhaps he would have cried the louder. This quote explains that orphans are treated even worse than just normal poor people. The atmosphere for Oliver as he was born would have been very gloomy as the parish didnt care about him, the midwife was drunk, but worst of all, his mother had just died. This paragraph is narrated with a grim but Ironic tone Oliver cried lustily. If he could have known that he was an orphan, left to the tender mercies of churchwardens and overseers, perhaps he would have cried the louder. The Irony shows Dickens anger and the grim tone shows his empathy. In the next chapter it is explained that its Olivers birthday, but we find him locked in a coal cellar having just been beaten because he is hungry. The woman looking after Oliver is appropriately named Mrs. Mann, this is specifically chosen by Dickens because she is very aggressive and manly in the way she treats the children, Dickens does this to give a sense of irony. She may also have been named this so the reader gets a good image in their head of what she looks like. Mrs. Mann is very 2-faced as the way she talks about the children to Mr. Bumble is as if she couldnt love them more He caught sight of Mrs. Mann behind the beadles chair, and was shaking her fist at him with a furious countenance. Showing how she doesnt want Mr. Bumble to know the truth. Mr Bumble is also a Very 2-faced person as we discover in the upcoming chapters. Both of these corrupt characters steal money that was given to them for the orphans, this shows how mistreated the orphans really were, because of the immoral and selfish carers. Mr Gamfield is an excellent example of mistreatment in the novel. When we first see him, he violently hits his donkey showing how he punishes his workers when they do something bad Mr Gamfield growled a fierce imprecation on the donkey and running after him, bestowed a blow on his head, which would inevitably have beaten in any skull but a donkeys. He is a greedy Character (like most of the Characters in the novel) and so he tries to get Oliver as an apprentice because he got money if he did as he could not raise the full five pounds for his rent Mr. Gamfield is immediately shown as a villainous character and Oliver recognises this. .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 , .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 .postImageUrl , .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 , .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036:hover , .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036:visited , .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036:active { border:0!important; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036:active , .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036 .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u4f04507290b8876b3ad48b4affe90036:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Poetry Analysis: Diana and Actaeon EssayOliver had a great fear of him, not only is he a bad person, he is a chimney sweep too. This another example of mistreatment in the Victorian era presented in the novel, chimney sweep apprentices often died or were badly injured because of the jobs they were given, young boys have been smothered in chimneys before now. But no-one decided to do anything about it. Because Mr. Gamfield was such a horrible person, if Oliver did become his apprentice and didnt want to do work, he would be beaten cold as we previously saw Mr. Gamfield do to his donkey earlier. This therefore is a chapter that is very important in showing the mistreatment i n the Victorian era. By the time Oliver goes to live with the Sowerberrys, the reader gets the idea that Olivers life should get better, but as we read on, we see that the Victorian middle class are not as we first perceived. Although Mrs. Sowerberry is not at first pleased that the orphan they received is very small and scrawny, she still takes him in and feeds him, even if it is the dogs food, Give the boy some scraps that were left aside for trip. Mrs. Sowerberry is a character that treats Oliver like an animal or object. Mr. Sowerberry is the only one who doesnt bully Oliver. The main bullying towards Oliver came from the other two servants the Sowerberrys had taken in Dya hear, workus said Noah Oh you queer soul! Said Charlotte bursting into a hearty laugh. As the servant from the least important background, Oliver wasnt treated as fairly as Charlotte and Noah. So when Noah took the Bullying too far in order to make Oliver cry, and Oliver lashed out, Oliver was unfairly punished without question of why he did it. Charlotte gave Oliver a blow with all her might: accompanying it with a scream, for the benefit of society. This shows how Noah, Charlotte and the sowerberrys mistreated Oliver, as both Charlotte and the sowerberrys took Noahs side. Oh! Charlotte, what a mercy we have not all been murdered in our beds! said Mrs. Sowerberry. Dickens here wants the reader to feel empathy for Oliver. These chapters are also a good examples of mistreatment, as we see how the lower class are used as servants, not only this, but we see that the lower the class of a person, the worse they are treated as we see with the unfair judgement on Oliver against Noah. Although when Oliver meets The Dodger and Fagin they treat him well, it was their original intention to rob him of what little he had. The Jew then mixed him a glass of hot gin and water; telling him he must drink it off directly, because another gentleman wanted the tumbler. Oliver did as he was desired. Immediately afterwards he felt himself gently lifted on to one of the sacks; and then he sunk into a deep sleep. Fagin also deceives Oliver a second time when he lies to Oliver about how the boys make the wipes when theyre actually stolen. We know this because Dickens uses dramatic Irony. He purposely makes Oliver very theyre very good ones, very. You havent marked them well, though, Charley; so the marks shall be picked out with a needle, and well teach Oliver how to do it. Shall us, Oliver, eh? Ha! ha! ha! If you please, sir, said Oliver He does this to make Oliver seem more vulnerable.  This chapter not only shows the mistreatment of Oliver, it shows the poverty of the Victorian times because Fagin and the gang have to steal to make a living.  Dickens presents life for the poor as the worst quality possible that people could live in. He did this because he wanted to give the upper class a taste of what it was like to live as a poor person, and that its not a chosen lifestyle. And that the way they were treated by higher class was terrible because they are so greedy. He uses Oliver as a perfect example of how the poor are stolen off and dont have any control over their own lives, like slaves.